Caseyverse Wiki:Copyright: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:12, 19 August 2024

All copyrightable elements of the Caseyverse and content on the Caseyverse Wiki have been waived in the public domain, under the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license, except for content submitted by others that contains elements from authors that are still under copyright for the duration.

AI Content

See also: Diffusion Guidelines

Under US copyright office guidelines and court rulings, AI-generated content, including works created using models like Diffusion, is not eligible for copyright protection. This determination stems from the foundational principle that copyright law safeguards expressions of human creativity. As AI-generated content arises from algorithmic processes guided by user prompts rather than original human authorship, it lacks the necessary element of human intellectual input to qualify for copyright.

In essence, the user provides instructions to the AI, akin to dictating a text or providing parameters for an artistic creation. The AI, acting as a sophisticated tool, executes these instructions, producing an output based on its training data and algorithms. This process does not constitute the independent creation of a protectable work under copyright law.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 == AI Content ==
 {{See also|Diffusion Guidelines}}
-Under US copyright offices and court rulings, AI-generated content, including those made using Diffusion, cannot be considered protected by copyright as it lacks human authorship. To put it simply, the user is merely instructing the computer to create based on a command, i.e., a prompt, and cannot be expected to possess the necessary intent and creativity required for copyright protection.
+Under US copyright office guidelines and court rulings, AI-generated content, including works created using models like Diffusion, is not eligible for copyright protection. This determination stems from the foundational principle that copyright law safeguards expressions of human creativity. As AI-generated content arises from algorithmic processes guided by user prompts rather than original human authorship, it lacks the necessary element of human intellectual input to qualify for copyright.
+In essence, the user provides instructions to the AI, akin to dictating a text or providing parameters for an artistic creation. The AI, acting as a sophisticated tool, executes these instructions, producing an output based on its training data and algorithms. This process does not constitute the independent creation of a protectable work under copyright law.